Nijam Siddiki Ahmed Ansari v. The State Of Maharashtra

11-BA-1792-2024.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1792 OF 2024 Nijam Siddiki Ahmed Ansari ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

Ms. Khan Nargis Aaquil Ahmed, Advocate, for the Applicant. Ms. Savita M. Yadav, APP, for the Respondent-State.

CORAM:

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED :

29th APRIL 2024 PC:- 1.

At the outset, Ms. Khan, learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to implead the victim as party-Respondent No2. Leave granted. Amendment be carried out forthwith.

2.

Issue notice to newly added Respondent No.2, returnable on 9th May 2024.

3.

The Investigating Officer to intimate added Respondent No.2 about the pendency of this Bail Application as well as that she can engage Advocate of her own choice or she can be provided with an Advocate from the High Court Legal Services Committee, Mumbai. Sonali

11-BA-1792-2024.DOC 4.

Ms. Yadav, learned APP states that a copy of the Bail Application is not served on the State of Maharashtra. 5.

Ms. Khan, learned Counsel for the Applicant states that copy of the Bail Application will be served on the State of Maharashtra during the course of the day.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Digitally signed by SONALI MILIND PATIL Date:

2024.04.29 17:56:34 +0530 SONALI MILIND PATIL Sonali