Navnath Nitin Vadhali v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

(93)-ba-1831-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1831 OF 2024 Navnath Nitin Vadhali ...

Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...

Respondents ------------------- Ms. Pravada Raut, for the applicant.

Mr. Pandurang H. Gaikwad-Patil, APP, for Respondent/State. Ms. Prajakta Jagtap, for respondent no. 2.

---------------------

CORAM

:

ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATE :

12TH JUNE, 2024.

Digitally signed by VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Date:

2024.06.12 18:34:33 +0530 VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD PC:

1.

After hearing for sometime, it is informed that the report of DNA is awaited. Considering the material collected by the IO during the investigation and from the charge-sheet it establishes prima facie involvement of the applicant. Thus, on expressing non-intimation to grant bail, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application with liberty to file a fresh application on receipt of the DNA report.

2.

Accordingly, permission to withdraw the bail application is granted with liberty to move a fresh application after receiving the DNA report.

varsha

(93)-ba-1831-2024.doc 3.

Bail application is disposed of as withdrawn. (ANIL S. KILOR, J) varsha