Firoz Aijaz Pathan v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

905-BA1899-2024.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1899 OF 2024 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Firoz Aijaz Pathan ...Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra and anr.

...Respondents

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.05.03 12:07:12 +0530 Mr. Tohid Shaikh, i/b Abdul Wahab Shaikh, for the Applicant.

Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP for the State/Respondent No.1.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

30th APRIL, 2024 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant.

2.

The learned APP makes a grievance that copy of the application has not been served on the respondent. 3.

The learned Counsel for the applicant undertakes to serve copy of the application on the respondent during the course of the day.

4.

Issue notice to the respondents.

5.

The learned APP waives notice for respondent No.1/State.

6.

Investigating Officer shall serve respondent No.2 and file report of service.

1/2

905-BA1899-2024.DOC 7.

The applicant shall furnish copy of the application to the Investigating Officer for service of notice on respondent No.2.

8.

Stand over to 20th June, 2024.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2