Kannan Murgesh Tevar v. The State Of Maharashtra

38-BA-3956-2023 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3956 OF 2023 Bhaskar Subramanyan Vellu .... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2096 OF 2024 Kannan Murgesh Tevar .... Applicant by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date:

2025.02.15 17:17:41 +0530 SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2971 OF 2024 Ravi Murti Tevar .... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ----- Mr. Ashish Shukla i/b Mr. P. V. Shukla, for the Applicant in BA/3956/2023.

Mr. Sagar Sonawane i/b Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad, for the Applicant in BA/2096/2024.

Mr. Kiran C. Shinde, APP, for the Respondent - State. ----- Shantanu Dhudum 1/2

38-BA-3956-2023 (CR).doc CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 13th FEBRUARY, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP. 2.

Learned APP seeks time to file affidavit-in-reply. 3.

Learned counsel for the Applicant strongly objected to allow an adjournment.

4.

Considering the submissions of learned APP, last chance is given to the learned APP to file affidavit-in-reply. If learned APP fails to file affidavit-in-reply on the next date, this Court would decide the matter on merit.

5.

Stand over to 10th March, 2025.

( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Shantanu Dhudum 2/2