Sanket Sunil Nakarde v. State Of Maharashtra

16-ba-2484-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2484 OF 2024 Sanket Sunil Nakarde ...

Applicant V/s.

State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent ------------------- Mr. Umesh Pawar, for the applicant.

Ms. Priyanka Rane, APP, for the Respondent / State.

CORAM

:

ANIL S. KILOR, J.

Digitally signed by VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Date:

2024.09.25 10:37:11 +0530 VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD DATE :

19TH SEPTEMBER, 2024.

PC:

1.

Heard.

2.

By this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the applicant is seeking bail in Crime No.135 of 2021, registered with Ichalkaranji Police Station, Kolhapur, for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504, 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Having gone through the charge-sheet and the relevant material collected by the IO during the investigation, it is evident that in the FIR as well as in the statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. of the eyewitnesses, a specific role is attributed to the applicant. It has come on record that the applicant was having sickle (koyta) and he gave blows on the person of the deceased.

varsha

16-ba-2484-2024.doc 4.

Thus, there is sufficient incriminating material available on record to show the involvement of the applicant in the alleged offence. Moreover, there are two antecedents against the applicant. Hence, there is every possibility that if the applicant is released on bail he may commit the similar offence.

5.

Considering the incriminating material against the applicant and the antecedents against the applicant, I am not inclined to grant bail, since offence is serious. Accordingly, it is rejected. (ANIL S. KILOR, J) varsha