Rajkumar Faujdar Pal v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

947.BA.2508.2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2508 OF 2024 Rajkumar Faujdar Pal ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

***  Mr. Prabhakar Pandey, for Applicant.

 Mr. Kiran C. Shinde, APP for Respondent.

*** CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

DATE : 22nd OCTOBER, 2024.

P. C. :

SHRIKANT SHRINIVAS MALANI SHRIKANT SHRINIVAS MALANI Date: 2024.10.22 18:26:27 +0530 1.

In this application, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has suffered incarceration for a period of more than 7 years and that only one witness has been examined although there are 18 witnesses proposed to be examined by the prosecution.

2.

On the other hand, the learned APP, on instructions, submits that 6 witnesses have been examined and the trial can be completed within the foreseeable future.

3.

In this backdrop, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks time to take appropriate instructions in the matter. 4.

List this application, on the top of the board, on 12th November, 2024, "for directions"

(MANISH PITALE, J.) Shrikant Malani