Himanshu Arjun Revale v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

908_BA_2511_2024.docx Prasad Rajput IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.

OF 2024 Himanshu Arjun Revale .. Applicant

Versus

The State Of Maharashtra and Anr.

.. Respondents ....................

 Ms. Sana Shaikh, Advocate for Applicant.

 Ms. Devyani Kulkarni, appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2.  Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for State.

 PSI - Sunil Sonawane, Charkop Police Station, Mumbai. ...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : MARCH 05, 2025 P. C.

:

1.

Heard Ms. Shaikh, learned Advocate for Applicant; Ms.Kulkarni, learned appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2 and Ms. Bajoria, learned APP for State.

2.

It is seen that, statement recorded under Section 164 is not placed on record. It is informed across the bar that statement under Section 164 is filed in the lower Court. 3.

Ms. Bajoria, learned APP is directed to place on record a copy of statement recorded under Section 164 to enable this Court to consider the present Bail Application. The learned lower Court seized of the matter shall provide a copy of statement recorded under Section 164 to the concerned Investigating Officer in the matter.

908_BA_2511_2024.docx 4.

Stand over to 13th March, 2025. To be listed under the caption 'Part Heard'.

P.R. Rajput [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]