Suraj Pannalal Sharma v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

23.BA.2537.2024.doc HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2537 OF 2024 Suraj Pannalal Sharma .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Suraj Pannalal Sharma a/w. Ms. Afsha Khatri and Mr. Tauqeer Siddiquie, Advocates for Applicant.

 Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for Respondent No.1.  None for Respondent No.2.

...................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : APRIL 03, 2025 P.C.

:

1.

Heard Mr. Sharma, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Bajoria, learned APP for Respondent No.1 2.

When the matter is called out, learned Advocate appointed for Respondent No.2 is not present.

3.

I am informed that learned Advocate appointed for Respondent No.2 has been served with copy of Bail Application. Learned appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2 is directed to remain present on the next adjourned date.

4.

Stand over to 16th April, 2025.

H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date:

2025.04.04 10:26:43 +0530 HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT