Tuntunkumar Rampravesh Mahato v. The State Of Maharashtra

931-BA-2846-2024.DOC P. S. Lakare

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2846 OF 2024 Tuntunkumar Rampravesh Mahato ...Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Vikrant Phatate, for the applicant, through V.C. Ms. P. P. Bhosale, APP for State-Respondent.

Ms. Tanvi Rane a/w Sayed Sanobar i/b Aisha Shaikh, Advocate for respondent no. 2.

CORAM:- ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATED:- 4th December, 2024 PC :- 1) Learned APP makes a statement that within next 4 to 5 months, the trial will be concluded as only four witnesses are left to be examined.

2) In view of the statement, learned counsel for the applicant on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present application with liberty to apply afresh, if the trial is not concluded within the period stated by the learned APP.

3) Accordingly, the application disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to apply afresh after six months, if the trial is not concluded.

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] 1/1