Umesh Sopan Sonawane v. State Of Maharashtra

928. BA 2885-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2885 OF 2024 Umesh Sopan Sonawane .Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3990 OF 2024 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2885 OF 2024 Sameer Sampat Jagtap .Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Umesh Sopan Sonawane .Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent ______________________________________________________________ Mr. Nitin Gaware - Patil a/w. Mr. Udaysinh Deshmush & Mr. Narayan Rokade, Advocates, for the Applicant Ms. Veera Shinde, APP, for the Respondent - State Mr. Ayush Pasbola a/w. Ms. Mrunal Bhide, Mr, Swaraj Sable, Advocates, for the Intervenor Mr. Anil Jadhav, Loni Kalbhor Police Station, Pune present ______________________________________________________________ CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATE : 29.11.2024 P. C.

1.

After hearing the matter for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant bail to the Applicant, learned Counsel for the Anand

928. BA 2885-2024.doc Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the Bail Application. Leave granted.

2.

The Bail Application is disposed of as withdrawn. 3.

In view of disposal of the Bail Application, the Interim Application, being I. A. No. 3990 of 2024 does not survive and the same is disposed of accordingly.

4.

However, the learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to apply afresh after receipt of the FSL Report, as regards voice sample. According to him, the voice in the alleged conversation is not of the Applicant. In the circumstances, liberty is granted to the Applicant to apply afresh in the case of changed circumstances or on receipt of the FSL Report.

(ANIL S.KILOR, J.) Anand