Ragini Amit Bhosale v. State Of Maharashtra

9.BA.2892.2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2892 OF 2024 Ragini Amit Bhosale ...Applicant SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR

Versus

SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2025.01.02 11:21:58 +0530 The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

***** Ms.Manisha Devkar:- Advocate for Applicant.

Mr.Ashok Gawai:- APP for Respondent No.1-State.

Mr.Anil Morde : API:- Satara Taluka Police Station.

*****

CORAM

:

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

19th DECEMBER 2024 P. C. :- 1.

Even though, learned Advocate Ms.Devkar is ready to go on with the hearing, today, it cannot be heard because learned APP Ms.Phad is not available.

2.

On 12th December 2024, she sought for adjournment in order to go through the papers about lock-up entries. In fact, according to Ms.Devkar, those entries are already there in the charge-sheet but, still, learned APP Ms.Phad wants to go through the papers. On that date, Satish Sangar 1/2

9.BA.2892.2024.doc she may be right but today, the Officer present submitted that whatever annexed to the charge-sheet is on the investigation papers. 3.

So, let learned APP to argue the matter on the next date positively.

4.

Stand over to 9th January 2025.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Satish Sangar 2/2