Babalu Urfa Kibriya Sahidu Mollya v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

31_BA_2976_2024.docx Prasad Rajput IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.

OF Babalu Urfa Kibriya Sahidu Mollya .. Applicant

Versus

State Of Maharashtra and Anr.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Bablu Jumman Shaikh, Advocate for Applicant.  Ms. Aneesa Cheema, appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2.  Ms. Mahalaxmi Ganapathy, APP for State.

......................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 24, 2025 P. C.

:

1.

Heard Mr. Shaikh, learned Advocate for Applicant, Ms. Cheema, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 and Ms. Ganpathy, learned APP for State. Perused the record of the case. 2.

At the outset the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 has been placed before the Court. Facts in the present case are peculiar. Copy of the Section 164 statement be given to the learned Advocate for Applicant who is arguing the Bail Application. 3.

Learned APP shall also give a copy to the learned Advocate for Applicant and learned appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2. On receiving copy of victim's statement recorded under Section 164, both the learned Advocates shall go through the

31_BA_2976_2024.docx same and be prepared to address the Court on the next adjourned date.

4.

Stand over to 10th March, 2025 (F.O.B.).

P.R. Rajput [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]