Babu Dhundappa @ Arjun Chintale v. State Of Maharashtra

902-ba3312-2024-Final-speaking.doc Shabnoor

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.3312 OF 2024 Babu Dhundappa @ Arjun Chintale ... Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Aditya Sharma for the applicant.

CORAM

: AMIT BORKAR, J.

DATED : AUGUST 1, 2025 P.C.:

1.

Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 25 July 2025. 2.

In 2nd line of paragraph 9 of the order, in respect of the sentence 'that the applicant has been duly identified during the Test Identification Parade conducted during the course of investigation' and in 1st line in paragraph 42(ii) of the order, in respect of the sentence 'The applicant has been duly identified in the Test Identification Parade, be corrected to read 'no Test Identification Parade of the present applicant was conducted during the course of investigation .'

3.

In 4th line of paragraph 6, in respect of the sentence 'and as on date, only a few have been examined' and in 6th line of paragraph 40, in respect of the sentence 'The prosecution has examined initial witnesses and there is progress in the trial' be

902-ba3312-2024-Final-speaking.doc corrected to read 'the witness examination has not yet commenced and trial is still at the stage of Section 294 of CrPC. 4.

Accordingly, corrections to be carried out in the original order and upload the same as order No.2.

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)