Arabshah Shahjahan Sayyed v. Union Of India And ANR.

4-BA3407-2024.DOC SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Santosh SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.12.05 10:59:38 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3407 OF 2024 Arabshah Shahjahan Sayyed ...Applicant

Versus

1. Union of India

2. The State of Maharashtra

...Respondents

Mr. Fauzan, i/b Vishant Rathod, for the Applicant. Mr. A. A. Naik, APP for the State.

PI Sheetal Mundhe, Kashimira Police Station, MBVV Commissionarate, present.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED :

4th DECEMBER, 2024 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

Mr. Fauzan holding for Mr. Rathod, the learned Counsel for the applicant, seeks short accommodation. 3.

None appears for respondent No.2.

4.

The office report indicates that notice could not be issued to respondent No.2 as the applicant has not furnished spare copy of the application.

5.

Let the applicant furnish the spare copy of the application for service of notice on the respondent.

6.

Stand over to 18th December, 20224.

1/2

4-BA3407-2024.DOC 7.

In addition to notice through Court, the applicant is at liberty to serve respondent No.2 by private service and file affidavit of service.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2