Pruthviraj Nagnath Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra

Shubhada S Kadam 10-BA-3816-2024 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3816 of 2024 Pruthviraj Nagnath Kamble ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Mr. Satyavrat Joshi along with Mr.Samay pawar and Ms. Sakshi Mane, Advocate for the Applicant.

Ms. Sangeeta D. Shinde, APP for Respondent-State. Mr. Sagar Pawar, API, Haveli Police Station, Pune, present. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 17th APRIL, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for respondent-State.

2.

Learned APP submitted that the Trial Court has issued nonbailable warrant against the absconding accused. Though non-bailable warrant was issued, the copy of order of issuance of non-bailable warrant was not served upon the concerned police station to execute the nonbailable warrant. Thereafter, the roznama shows that without cancelling the non-bailable warrant, the absconding accused appeared before the Trial Court.

3.

Considering the submissions of learned APP, call report from Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2025.04.21 12:34:50 +0530 SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM the concerned judge, why the copy of order of issuance of non-bailable 1/2

Shubhada S Kadam 10-BA-3816-2024 (CR).doc warrant was not given to the concerned police station for execution and whether the non-bailable warrant of the absconding accused is cancelled without any application.

4.

Stand over to 5th May 2025.

5.

The Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Judge.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 2/2