Anurag O Prajapati v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Shubhada S Kadam 25-ba-3921-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3921 OF 2024 Anurag O. Prajapati ... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

.... Respondent Mr. Viral Rathod along with Ms. Karuna Mallah, Mr. Vishwatej Jadhav and Ms. Bimla Chrunal, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Anand S. Shalgaonkar, APP for Respondent-State. Mr. Sawant, PSI, Goregaon Police Station.

CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP. 2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is behind bar since more than 4 years, yet charge has not been framed against the accused.

3.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant, call report from the concerned Judge as to why the charge is not framed against the applicant.

4.

The Registrar (Judicial-I) to communicate this order to the concerned Judge and call report from the concerned judge by next date. SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2025.01.15 11:49:41 +0530 1/2

Shubhada S Kadam 25-ba-3921-2024.doc 5.

Mr. Shakeel Ahmed, Advocate, who is on the panel of High Court Legal Aid, is appointed to espouse the cause of respondent No.2. 6.

Stand over to 3rd February 2025.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 2/2