Mukesh Gupta v. The State Of Maharashtra

Shubhada S Kadam 26-ba-3970-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.3970 of 2024 Mukesh Rajnarayan Gupta ... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Ms. Misbaah Solkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Nitin B. Patil, APP for Respondent-State. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP. 2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is behind bar since more than 4 years, yet charge has not been framed against the accused.

3.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant, call report from the concerned Judge as to why the charge is not framed against the applicant.

4.

The Registrar (Judicial-I) to communicate this order to the concerned Judge and call report from the concerned judge by next date. 5.

Stand over to 27th January 2025.

SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2025.01.15 11:49:37 +0530 1/1