Avdhut Sunil Panbude v. The State Of Maharashtra

25-BA-4312-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4312 OF 2024 Avdhut Sunil Panbude ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

__________ Mr. Pratik G. Tare i/b Ms. Sakshi Sanjay Kadam, learned Advocate for the Applicant.

Ms. Veera Shinde, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. __________ CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

31st JULY 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard Mr. Pratik Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. Veera Shinde, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. 2.

On 12th June 2025, at the request of learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent, time to file reply was granted as a last chance. 3.

Ms. Veera Shinde, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent submits that the reply could not be completed for want of documents. She submits that the time granted by order dated 12th June 2025 be extended by further period of two weeks. 4.

Mr. Pratik Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicant does not object for extension of time, however subject to serving a advance copy of reply on the learned Advocate for the Applicant. Gitalaxmi

25-BA-4312-2024.doc 5.

In view of the above, time to file reply by learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent is extended by two weeks from today by serving a advance copy on the learned Advocate for the Applicant. 6.

At the request of Ms. Veera Shinde, learned A.P.P. and by consent of the parties, list the matter on 21st August 2025. [ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.] GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2025.08.01 10:51:56 +0530 Gitalaxmi