Chhotkan Ramfal Safi v. The State Of Maharashtra

LSP 1 23 ba 4320.24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Bail Application No. 4320 of 2024 Chhotkan Ramfal Safi ...

Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondents.

Mr. Viral Mukte Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. Tanveer Khan APP for the State.

CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J DATE : 12th December 2025.

P.C. :

It is true that there is an inadvertent mistake in the order dated 22nd August 2025. In fact Advocate Viral Mukte is appointed by the Applicant, an under trial prisoner. In the order it is recorded that he is appointed for Respondent No.2 - victim. 2.

It is true this application for bail by the applicant who is registered for an offence under Section 302 of IPC was filed by accused-Chutka through jail. Today, it is made clear that learned Advocate Mukte is appointed to represent the Applicant-Accused. 3.

Let the MSLSA to issue necessary appointment letter. Learned APP graciously agreed to supply copy of the charge-sheet to learned Advocate Mukte.

LSP 2 23 ba 4320.24.doc 4.

In view of that, let the matter be listed on 16th January 2026. He is at liberty to tender copy of the order passed by the Sessions Court about rejecting the bail on the next date. (S.M. MODAK, J.)