Rajiv Vishnu Saxena v. State Of Maharashtra

8 ba 4425 of 2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.4425 OF 2024 Rajiv Vishnu Saxena ...

Applicant versus State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...

Respondents Mr. Gopal Singh with Mr. Vikas Tiwari, Mr. Hrithik Singh, for Applicant. Mr. A.A.Naik, APP for State.

Mr. Padam Kumar Jalan with Mr. Rohan Waghmare, for Intervener. CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

27 NOVEMBER 2024 P.C.

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

Learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks further time to carry out amendment.

3.

Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith. 4.

Learned Counsel for the Applicant, however, submits that the copy of the application has been served on the first informant. 5.

Mr. Jalan, learned Counsel submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of Respondent No.2 - first informant and undertakes to file vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent No.2. Learned Counsel seeks one week's time to file an affidavit in reply.

6.

Let the affidavit in reply on behalf of Respondent No.2 be filed within one week.

SSP 1/2

8 ba 4425 of 2024.doc 7.

Stand over to 16 December 2024.

( N.J.JAMADAR, J. ) SSP 2/2 Signed by: S.S.Phadke Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 29/11/2024 10:26:10