Kiran Dinkar Rajguru v. State Of Maharashtra
Iresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4528 OF 2024 Tushar Suryakant Kale .....Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4418 OF 2024 Anandgir Madhugir Gosavi .....Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent IRESH MASHAL WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4530 OF 2024 Digitally signed by IRESH MASHAL Date:
2025.01.28 15:03:17 +0530 Kiran Dinkar Rajguru .....Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4522 OF 2024 Ashok Balasaheb Sankpal .....Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent Mr. Ayaz Khan i/b Ms. Swarali Joglekar for applicant in BA 4528/2024 Mr. Shekhar Mane for applicant in BA 4522/2024 Mr. Pandit Kasar for the applicant in BA 4418/2024 1/3
Mr. Shishir Hiray, Special PP a/w Mr. Sanjay Kokane, Mr. Ankur Pahade APP and Ms. S. G. Talhar APP for the respondent State CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE :
24th JANUARY 2025 ORDER:
1.
Learned special PP seeks time on the ground that he is unable to point out the relevant page numbers of the charge-sheet from the copy of the charge-sheet filed in the bail applications. He, therefore, seeks time.
2.
In Bail Application No. 4418 of 2024, on 22nd November 2024, the application was adjourned at the request of respondent. On 3rd December 2024, the application was adjourned on the request made by the respondents that all the connected bail applications be heard together. Hence, by way of last chance, the bail applications were adjourned to 3rd January 2025. On 3rd January 2025, the applications were adjourned at the request of the applicants. 3.
Today again, learned special PP seeks time on the ground which is absolutely not justified. The concerned authorities who assign the matters to special PP may provide assistance in the manner required to the learned special PP so that on such grounds, learned special PP would not ask time and waste the judicial time of the Court. 2/3
4.
Learned special PP requests to file his own compilation. The prayer is rejected. The entire charge-sheet is already filed by the applicants. In the reply filed by the learned special PP, there is no such dispute raised that the proper compilation of the charge-sheet is not filed.
5.
At the request of special PP, by way of last chance, list the applications on 5th February 2025. To be listed high on board in the caption of 'Admission'.
6.
It is clarified that no further adjournment will be granted. 7.
At this stage, I find it necessary to record that inspite of granting an adjournment, learned special PP is not ready to stop his arguments. It is therefore necessary to record that even in earlier bail applications i.e. Criminal Bail Application No. 2987 of 2022 and connected applications decided by me, the conduct of the learned special PP is recorded in paragraph 33 of the order. It is therefore, expected that the learned special PP would maintain the decorum of the Court and argue the bail applications with some responsibility. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 3/3