Avinash Santosh Garud v. The State Of Maharashtra

15-BA-4698-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4698 OF 2024 Avinash Santosh Garud ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

__________ Mr. Akshay Bankapur, learned Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Anamika Malhotra, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. Ms. Kanchan Pawar, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2. __________ CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

4th SEPTEMBER 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard Mr. Akshay Bankapur, learned Advocate for the Applicant, Ms. Anamika Malhotra, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent and Ms. Kanchan Pawar, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2.

2.

This Court on 17th January 2025 had directed impleadment of the complainant/injured as a party-Respondent, for the reasons recorded in the said order.

3.

Ms. Kanchan Pawar, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2 submits that the complainant/injured was impleaded as partyRespondent No. 2. She submits that she appears on behalf of Respondent No. 2. She requests time for placing on record the factual position.

Gitalaxmi

15-BA-4698-2024.doc 4.

Request made by Ms. Kanchan Pawar, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2 is not objected to by Mr. Akshay Bankapur, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. Anamika Malhotra, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. Time granted. 5.

At the request of Ms. Kanchan Pawar, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2 and by consent of the parties, list the matter on 19th September 2025.

[ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.] GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2025.09.05 17:13:58 +0530 Gitalaxmi