Nandan Dinesh Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

Shubhada S Kadam ba-4701-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4701 of 2024 Nandan Dinesh Yadav and anr.

... Applicants versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondents Ms. Nikita Mandaniyan i/b. Mr. Harshad V. Bhadbhade, Advocate for the Applicants.

CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 24th NOVEMBER, 2024.

(In Chambers) P.C. :

1.

Not on board. Mentioned by way of praecipe. Due to urgency, the matter is taken up for hearing.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants.

3.

Notice has not been served upon the other side. 4.

It is contention of learned counsel for the applicants that it is informed that applicant No.1 has suffered mild heart attack and he has been treated in jail. In jail, there is no facility to treat heart attack patients, hence, requested for direction to be given to the jail authority for giving proper treatment to applicant No.1.

5.

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for applicants, the jail authority is directed to provide proper treatment to applicant No.1 Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2024.11.24 12:47:26 +0530 SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM and, if required, send him to proper hospital for taking treatment. 1/2

Shubhada S Kadam ba-4701-2024.doc 6.

Issue notice to the respondents returnable on 25th November 2024.

7.

List the matter before the concerned Court tomorrow i.e. on 25th November 2024.

8.

All concerned to act upon authenticated copy of this order. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 2/2