Adil Imtiaz Vohra v. The State Of Maharashtra

901.BA.5075.24.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 5075 OF 2024 Adil Imtiaz Vohra .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....................

 Mr. Anil G. Lalla a/w. Mr. Yash Pulekar, Ms. Rithika Yerra, Ms. Ankita Rathod, Advocates for Applicant.

 Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, APP for Respondent - State.  Mr. Sawant, PI - DCB, CID, Unit - 7, Mumbai present. ....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : APRIL 30, 2025.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Lalla, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Ganapathy, learned APP for Respondent - State. 2.

Ms. Ganapathy, learned APP would inform the Court that order dated 22.04.2025 stands complied with and the prisoner's Medical Report filed by the Chief Medical Officer, Mumbai Central Prison, Mumbai is placed on record. The said Medical Report prima facie records that Applicant before the Court is detected HIV positive. 3.

At the outset, Ms. Ganapathy would persuade the Court to consider her request for opposing release of the Applicant on medical bail on the aforesaid grounds. If that be the case, then the case of the prosecution will have to be placed on Affidavit to explain the reason as to why they are opposed to grant of bail on medical ground.

901.BA.5075.24.doc 4.

Learned prosecutor would therefore persuade the Court to give one week time to file its Affidavit-in-Reply to oppose the present Bail Application. Let the Affidavit-in-Reply be filed within a period of two weeks from today.

5.

List the Bail Application on Board on 11th June 2025. 6.

In case of any urgency, liberty to mention before the Vacation Court.

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.04.30 14:36:18 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE