Iqramuddin Naseem Ahmed Idrisi v. State Of Maharashtra

32-aba-1-24 Gokhale

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2024 Iqramuddin Naseem Ahmed Idrisi ..Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent __________ Mr. Vishwatej Jadhav i/b. Viral Rathhod for Applicant. Mr. Swapnil V. Valve, APP for State/Respondent. __________ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 11 JUNE 2024 PC :

1.

Learned APP pointed out that the first informant had intervened at the stage of hearing of anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court. The applicant has not added the first informant as a party respondent in this application. 2.

I find substance in the submission of the learned APP. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to add the first informant as a party respondent in this application without disclosing her identity. The amendment shall be carried out within a period of one week from today.

Digitally signed by VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date:

2024.06.12 15:03:43 +0530 VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE

32-aba-1-24 3.

Learned counsel shall also annex a copy of the order passed by the Sessions Court.

4.

Issue Notice to the added respondent, returnable on 11.07.2024.

5.

Stand over to 11.07.2024.

6.

Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)