Ramesh Gulab Khandebharad v. State Of Maharashtra

901-ABA-17-2024.doc Arjun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.17 OF 2024 Ramesh Gulab Khandebharad & Anr.

...Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.12 OF 2024 ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2026.01.07 19:51:33 +0530 Mangesh Nivrutti Hole ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

_______________________________________________________________ Mr. Rohan Hogle, for the Applicants.

Mr. S. M. Mangaonkar, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. S. S. Bedekar, for the Complainant.

_______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED: 07 JANUARY 2026 P.C.:

1.

At the outset, Mr. Mangaonkar, learned APP, for the RespondentState, submits that 'A' Summary Report has been filed by the Applicants. 2.

Accordingly, nothing survives in the Anticipatory Bail Applications. The Anticipatory Bail Applications are disposed of. 3.

In the event the 'A' Summary Report is not accepted by the learned JMFC, liberty is granted to the Applicants to file appropriate proceedings.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]