Pronit Prem Nath And ANR. v. State Of Maharashtra

2025:BHC-AS:5239 Diksha Rane 901. ABA 68-24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.68/2024 PRONIT PREM NATH & ANR.

..APPLICANTS VS.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Adv. Ashwin Thool a/w. Adv. Sarthak B., Adv. Archishmati Chandramore for applicants.

Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for the State.

------------ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 4, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the parties have amicably settled the dispute between them, to that effect the consent terms have been filed in the City Civil Court. The learned counsel for the applicants further submits that the present First Information Report has been quashed, therefore, nothing survives for consideration in the application. 2.

In view of the above, the application is disposed of as withdrawn.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 04/02/2025 14:37:36