Jay Chandraprakash Shukla And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

28.aba-174-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.174 OF 2024 Jay Chandraprakash Shukla and another .....Applicants

Versus

State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ....

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.380 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.174 OF 2024 ----- Ms. Neha Patil, Advocate i/b. Omkar Patil for the Applicants. Mr. Vithal B. Konde Deshmukh, APP for the RespondentState. ----- CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 03rd JULY, 2024 P.C. :

1.

In this case, the Applicants were granted adinterim relief. At that time, learned counsel for the intervenor was also present. Today, nobody represents the intervenor. Therefore, in the interest of justice to give him one more chance, I am adjourning the matter with continuation of ad-interim relief. By the order dated Deshmane(PS)

: 2 :

28.aba-174-24.odt 13.1.2024, the Applicants were directed to attend the concerned police station on particulate dates. Learned counsel for the Applicants submitted that the Applicant No.1 was already arrested in some other case and, therefore, he could not attend the police station. However, the Applicant No.2 has attended the police station and has cooperated with the investigation. The statement is not disputed by learned APP.

2.

Stand over to 8.8.2024. Ad-interim relief, granted earlier, to continue till then.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) by PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date:

2024.07.08 14:36:05 +0530 PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE