Balasaheb Shivaji Jagtap v. State Of Maharashtra

1 / 2 20-ABA-230-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.230 OF 2024 Balasaheb Shivaji Jagtap .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent .......

• Mr. Saurabh K. C. Raut, Advocate for Applicant. • Smt. Sangita D. Shinde, APP for the State/Respondent.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 24th JUNE, 2024 P.C. :

1.

In this application, the Applicant was protected vide the order dated 25/01/2024. He was directed to attend the concerned police station as and when called.

2.

Learned counsel for the Applicant states that after 25/01/2024 when that order was passed, the Applicant was never called for investigation purpose. The Investigating Officer MANUSHREE NESARIKAR also could not point out any material that the Applicant was MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Date: 2024.06.27 12:33:51 +0530 called for investigation after 25/01/2024. Therefore, Nesarikar

2 / 2 20-ABA-230-24.odt considering the order passed on that count, the Applicant is directed to attend the concerned police station on 08/07/2024, 09/07/2024 and 10/07/2024 from 01.00 p.m. to 05.00 p.m. and thereafter as and when called. The Applicant shall cooperate with the investigation.

3.

The application shall be listed on 23/07/2024. 4.

Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till then. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)