← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/374/2024rejected

Pushpendra Manmal Angara v. State Of Maharashtra

2024-08-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal2 pages

23-aba-374-24 Gokhale

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 374 OF 2024 Pushpendra Manmal Angara ..Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ______ Ms. Isha Saglani a/w. Siddhant S. Kusalkar, Durgesh Sarfare and Ashish Phadke for Applicant.

Mr. Swapnil V. Walve, APP for State/Respondent. Mr. P. V. Nichani for Informant.

______ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 22 AUGUST 2024 P.C. :

1.

Learned APP states that the investigating officer intends to call the first informant, as well as, the present applicant on the same date for making enquiries about their transactions. He seeks adjournment with direction to the applicant to attend the concerned police station on a particular date, so that, the informant can also attend the concerned police station on that date.

2.

Hence, the following order :

Digitally signed by VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date:

2024.08.26 11:29:42 +0530 VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE

23-aba-374-24

O R D E R

i) The Applicant shall attend the concerned police station on 18.09.2024, 19.09.2024 and 20.09.2024 between 1.00p.m. to 5.00p.m. and thereafter as and when called and shall cooperate with the investigation.

ii) The Applicant can produce the relevant documents and shall co-operate with the investigation.

iii) Stand over to 03.10.2024.

iv) Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)