Harleen Chintan Vanjara v. State Of Maharashtra

905-ABA-398-2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 398 OF 2024 Harleen Chintan Vanjara .... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ______ YUGANDHARA SHARAD PATIL by YUGANDHARA SHARAD PATIL Date:

2024.02.22 16:32:15 +0530 Mr.Puneet Chaturvedi a/w Shreyas Baid i/b A. Karim Pathan, for the Applicant.

Ms. Pallavi N. Dabholkar, APP for the State/Respondent. ______ CORAM :SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 21st FEBRUARY, 2024 P.C. :

1.

Learned APP, on instructions of the Investigating Officer, makes a statement that custody of the Applicant in this case is not necessary and the charge-sheet is already filed. The statement is recorded and accepted.

2.

Considering this statement, the learned counsel for the Applicant does not press this Application. The Application is disposed of.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) y.s.patil