Jeetendra Kumar Raj v. The State Of Maharashtra

29- ABA 508 of 2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 508 OF 2024 Jeetendra Kumar Raj ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 509 OF 2024 Anurag Kumar Patanwar ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Abhinav Shrivastava (through VC) a/w. Mr. Paras Yadav i/by Mr. Sumant Patale, for the Applicants.

Mr.S.R. Agarkar. APP, for the Respondent/State. PI D.K. Kapare, Pimpri Police Station.

CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

MARCH 26, 2024 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State.

2.

The learned APP, on instructions, submits that the Applicant-Jeetendra Kumar Raj has only once attended the investigating officer and the Applicant-Anurag Kumar Patanwar has not at all appeared before the investigating officer. 3.

The learned counsel for the Applicants submits that the Applicants have deposited the amount, as undertaken, and that on account of personal difficulties they could not appear before V A Tikam ...1

29- ABA 508 of 2024.doc the investigating officer.

4.

Let the Applicants appear before the investigating officer on 15th , 16th and 17th April, 2024 between 10.00 am. to 1.00 pm.

5.

Stand over to 22nd April, 2024.

6.

Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date.

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.) V A Tikam ...2