Manoj Anand Raje v. State Of Maharashtra

21-aba-572-2024+.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 572 OF 2024 Vinod Suresh Hirani ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 391 OF 2024 Jitendra Harilal Parikh ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 576 OF 2024 Shrinivas Lakshman Surkanti ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 573 OF 2024 AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV Date: 2024.05.02 14:59:54 +0530 Diksha Manilal Shah ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 574 OF 2024 Paresh Shah ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 575 OF 2024 Manoj Anad Raje ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Amol ...1

21-aba-572-2024+.doc Mr. Pallavi Pukale, i/b, Mahadik & Associates, for Applicant in ABA/572/2024, ABA/573/2024, ABA/574/2024, ABA/575/2024 & ABA/576/2024. for the Applicant.

Mr. Akshay Kapadia, for the Applicant in ABA/391/2024. Mr. Rahul Gautam, i/b, Ms. Gayatri P Shahane, for the Complainant. Mr. Prashant Jadhav, APP, for the Respondent/State. CORAM :

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

April 30, 2024 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Counsel for the first informant seeks further time to file an affidavit-in-reply.

3.

Let the affidavit-in-reply on behalf of respondent no. 2 be filed within a period of three weeks and copy served on the respective applicants.

4.

Stand over to 24th June, 2024.

5.

Ad-interim relief, granted earlier, shall continue to operate till the next date.

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.) Amol ...2