Rakesh Ahire v. State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

19-aba-577-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.577 OF 2024 Rakesh Ahire .....Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ....

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1547 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.577 OF 2024 ----- Mr. Rahul Shelke, Advocate a/w. Akshay Bansode for the Applicant.

Mr. Swapnil V. Walve, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Zeeshan I. Khan, Advocate for the Intervenor. ----- CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 19th SEPTEMBER, 2024 P.C. :

1.

The Applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with C.R.No.580/2023 registered at Powai Police Station, Mumbai.

2.

Learned APP, on instructions, states that after the Applicant was protected by way of ad-interim order dated PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE 1.3.2024, the Applicant has attended the concerned police PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date: 2024.09.23 13:16:31 +0530 Deshmane(PS)

: 2 :

19-aba-577-24.odt station and has cooperated with the investigation. Learned APP, on instructions, makes a further statement that the investigating agency does not want to arrest the Applicant in the present subject matter. The statement is recorded and accepted.

3.

In view of this statement, the learned counsel for the Applicant does not press this Application as there is no apprehension of arrest. Learned counsel for the intervenor submits that the informant company has suffered losses and their rights be protected.

4.

Considering this situation, the Application is disposed of as not pressed. Needless to add that the informant company is at liberty to pursue the other legal remedies in accordance with law. With disposal of the main Application, intervention Application is also disposed of. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)