Mohd. Hanif Shaikh @ Mohd. Hanif Mohd. Yusuf Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

39-ABA-674-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.674 OF 2024 Mohd. Hanif Shaikh @ Mohd. Hanif Mohd. Yusuf Shaikh .....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ----- Mr. Anand P. Pande, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Swapnil V. Walve, APP for the Respondent-State. ----- CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 27th JUNE, 2024 P.C. :

1.

Learned counsel for the Applicant states that there is further development. The Applicant has handed over possession of the flat to the informant, who does not have any grievance any further. As far as the other nine persons are concerned, he has given possession to five others and the others are not willing to pay the balance amount. 2.

These statements made before the Court today shall be brought on record through an additional affidavit. Such additional affidavit shall be filed within two weeks Deshmane(PS)

: 2 :

39-ABA-674-24.odt from today with a copy to learned APP. Learned APP to take instructions in that behalf.

3.

Stand over to 1.8.2024. Ad-interim relief, granted earlier, to continue till them. In the meantime, the applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when called and shall cooperate with the investigation. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) by PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date:

2024.07.02 12:48:58 +0530 PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE