Mohd. Hanif Shaikh @ Mohd. Hanif Mohd. Yusuf Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

25-aba-674-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.674 OF 2024 Mohd. Hanif Shaikh @ Mohd. Hanif Mohd. Yusuf Shaikh .....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ----- Mr. Anand Pande, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Swapnil V. Walve, APP for the Respondent-State. ----- CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 19th SEPTEMBER, 2024 P.C. :

1.

The Applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with C.R. No.68/2024 registered at Vakola police station, Mumbai. The Applicant was protected by way of adinterim order dated 8.3.2024. 2.

Learned counsel for the Applicant, pursuant to the earlier order, has tendered additional affidavit, though it is tendered beyond the period of two weeks as directed. Learned APP, on instructions of the investigating officer, PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE states that the Applicant has attended the concerned police PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date: 2024.09.23 13:16:31 +0530 Deshmane(PS)

: 2 :

25-aba-674-24.odt station and has cooperated with the investigation. He makes further statement, on instructions, that the investigating agency does not want to arrest the Applicant in the present subject matter. The statement is recorded and accepted. In view of this statement, since there is no apprehension of arrest in this case for investigation, learned counsel for the Applicant does not press this Application. Accordingly, the Application is disposed of as not pressed.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)