Pratik Machindra Pabale v. State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

15.aba-946-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.946 OF 2024 Pratik Machindra Pabale .....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ----- Mr. Satyam H. Nimbalkar, Advocate a/w. Abhishek Arote, for the Applicant.

Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, APP for the Respondent-State. ----- CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 08th APRIL, 2024 P.C. :

1.

Learned APP makes a statement that the Applicant shall not be arrested till 17.4.2024. The statement is recorded.

2.

The investigating agency will have to respond to the submissions made by learned counsel for the Applicant that there are some transactions which show that some amount from the account maintained with Parsik Bank in the name of Adhiraj Land Developers was transferred to the account of the same name in ICICI Bank because the Deshmane(PS)

: 2 :

15.aba-946-24.odt informant's case is that he was not aware of the account in the Parsik Bank in which the Applicant was shown as the Proprietor. The investigating agency shall show relevant transactions from the account maintained with Parsik Bank. 3.

Stand over to 17.4.2024.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date: 2024.04.10 16:09:18 +0530