Ranjana Somnath Wagh v. State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

35-ABA-1173-24+.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1173 OF 2024 Snehal Somnath Wagh .....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent .....

WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1182 OF 2024 Ranjana Somnath Wagh .....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ----- Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil, Advocate i/b. Saili Dhuru for the Applicants.

Smt. Sangita D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Nilkanth Rajaram Jagtap, Police Inspector, Warje Malwadi police station, Pune.

----- CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 28th JUNE, 2024 P.C. :

1.

The Applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with C.R. No.15/2024 registered at Khadakwasla police station (which was subsequently investigated by Warje Malwadi Police Station) under Sections 302, 498-A, 109 read with 34 of IPC.

Deshmane(PS)

: 2 :

35-ABA-1173-24+.odt 2.

On the previous occasion, the Applicants were protected by way of ad-interim order dated 3.5.2024 and both of them were directed to report to the police station. 3.

Learned APP, on instructions, states that both the Applicants have reported to the police station and have cooperated with the investigation.

4.

Learned APP, on instructions of the I.O., further makes a statement that there is no evidence against the present Applicants and the investigating agency does not want to arrest them in connection with this offence. The statement is recorded.

5.

In view of this statement, learned counsel for the Applicants does not press these Applications. Hence, the Applications are disposed of as not pressed.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) by PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date:

2024.07.03 11:25:34 +0530 PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE