Siddharth Rajkumar Tiwari And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

27.ABA-1240-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1240 OF 2024 Siddharth Rajkumar Tiwari and another .....Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ----- Mr. Sarthak Shetty, Advocate a/w Suristi Tiwari i/b. Ravishankar Dwivedi for the Applicants.

Mr. C.D. Mali, APP for the Respondent-State.

Mr. Indu Prakash Tripathi, Advocate i/b. C.K. Tripathi for the intervener.

----- CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 06th MAY, 2024 P.C. :

1.

The Court time is over. Learned counsel for the Applicant does not have instructions whether any matrimonial proceedings are pending.

2.

Learned counsel appearing for the first informant produced a print out of the proceedings pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan.

Deshmane(PS)

: 2 :

27.ABA-1240-24.odt 3.

Since learned counsel for the Applicant has no instructions in that matter and since this is an important consideration, today it is not possible to consider the question of ad-interim relief. The Applicant is granted liberty to move the Vacation Bench. If the matter is not listed before the Vacation Bench, it shall be listed on 19.6.2024.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date: 2024.05.09 10:59:53 +0530