Shaikh Imran Shaikh Usman Qureshi And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 / 2 11-ABA-1347-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1347 OF 2024 Shaikh Imran Shaikh Usman Qureshi & Anr.

.... Applicants versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

.... Respondents .......

• Mr. Sanjeev Kadam i/b. Mahendra N.Sandhyanshiv, Advocate for Applicant.

• Mr. Avinash A. Naik, APP for the State/Respondent. • Mr. Aabad Ponda, Senior Advocate a/w Manoj R. Gowd a/w Kavita N. Durgapal, Advocate for Intervenor.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 10th MAY, 2024 P.C. :

1.

Leave to amend is granted to add the first informant as a party Respondent. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2.

Learned Senior Counsel Mr. Aabad Ponda appears and states that the first informant was heard before the Sessions Court in the Anticipatory Bail Application of the Applicants and Digitally signed by MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Date:

2024.05.10 15:49:50 +0530 MANUSHREE NESARIKAR therefore he needs to be heard in this matter as well. Nesarikar

2 / 2 11-ABA-1347-24.odt 3.

Learned counsel for the Applicants submitted that the order of Sessions Court is not yet uploaded.

4.

In this view of the matter, the Applicants are at liberty to mention this matter before the vacation bench. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)