Imtiyaz Ahmed Md. Yusuf Shaikh v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

bipin prithiani 34-aba-1526.24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1526 OF 2024 Imtiyaz Ahmed Md. Yusuf Shaikh ...

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...

Respondents ****** None for the Applicant.

Ms. Megha S. Bajoria APP for Respondent No.1-State. Ms. M. A. Gowalani for Respondent No.2.

****** CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J.

DATE : 7th OCTOBER 2024 P.C. :

.

There is no appearance on behalf of the applicant. On the last date of listing i.e. 30th September 2024 also there was no appearance on behalf of the applicant.

DHARMENDER PRITHIANI Date: 2024.10.08 14:37:10 +0530 BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI 2.

The respondent No.2 in the present case was served, as offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 are also registered against the applicant. 3.

There is no interim order operating in the present application.

4.

This Court has perused the papers. It is found that the victims in the present case have made clear allegations against the applicant of having inflicted sexual abuse on them. The victims were minor girls, aged about 3 years and 8 years. They are both

bipin prithiani 34-aba-1526.24.doc nieces of the applicant. Statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, of one of the victims, is brought to the notice of this Court, which describes in graphic detail, as to the manner in which the applicant used to sexually abuse the minor girls.

5.

The learned APP and the learned counsel appointed to appear on behalf of respondent No.2, opposed the prayer made in the present application.

6.

As noted herein above, there is no appearance on behalf of the applicant. The application is dismissed.

MANISH PITALE, J.