Ashok Jayram Saroj v. The State Of Maharashtra

504_ABA1773_24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1773 OF 2024 Ashok Jayram Saroj ...

Applicant Vs.

State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent Mr. Nikhil Manohar Pujari for Applicant.

Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP for Respondent-State.

CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

DATE : JULY 08, 2024 P.C. :

.

Heard Mr. Pujari, learned counsel counsel for the applicant and Mr. Khan, learned APP for the respondent-State. 2.

In the light of the applicant himself having informed the police on 22.05.2024 and FIR having been registered, this Court put certain queries to the learned APP as regards the role of the applicant, who was a branch manager of the concerned bank, in the offences registered in terms of the subject FIR dated 26.05.2024.

3.

The learned APP submitted that today, investigating officer could not remain present due to heavy rains and that on the next date, the officer will remain present along with investigation papers. 4.

In the light of the contents of the reply filed on behalf of the State before the Sessions Court, particularly paragraph 7 at page 58, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that an additional affidavit along with relevant documents can be kept ready to furnish an appropriate explanation.

MINAL SANDIP PARAB by MINAL SANDIP PARAB Date: 2024.07.10 10:31:25 +0530 5.

In view of the above, list the application for further consideration 1/2

504_ABA1773_24.doc on 12.07.2024, to be included in the supplementary list, when the investigating officer shall remain present with the investigation papers. 6.

On the next date, the applicant shall keep ready the affidavit along with relevant documents in the light of the observations made hereinabove.

(MANISH PITALE, J.) Minal Parab 2/2