Vijay Dodhu Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra
912_ABA1912&14_24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1912 OF 2024 Vijay Dodhu Patil ...
Applicant Vs.
State of Maharashtra ...
Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3321 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1912 OF 2024 ALONG WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1914 OF 2024 Atul Kumar Pandey ...
Applicant Vs.
State of Maharashtra ...
Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3330 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1914 OF 2024 --- Mr. Rahul V. Shinde i/b. Mr. Samadhan A. Kashid for Applicants in ABA/1912/2024 and ABA/1914/2024.
Ms. Rutuja A. Ambekar, APP for Respondent-State. Mr. Tanmay T. Jadhav i/b. Mr. Nikhilesh D. Pote for Intervenor/Applicant in IAs. CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.
DATE : OCTOBER 16, 2024 P.C. :
.
In these two applications, on 25.07.2024, this Court granted interim relief in favour of the applicants, for reasons specifically recorded in paragraph 4 of the order.
2.
The first informant has filed intervention applications opposing MINAL SANDIP PARAB the relief claimed in these applications.
by MINAL SANDIP PARAB Date: 2024.10.16 18:06:41 +0530 1/2
912_ABA1912&14_24.doc 3.
Ms. Ambekar, learned APP makes a statement that despite interim relief being granted in favour of the applicants, they did not appear before the investigating officer on 27.07.2024, as directed by this Court. 3.
Mr. Shinde, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he will take appropriate instructions in the matter. This Court is also informed that charge-sheet has been filed, which is voluminous. 4.
While granting interim order on 25.07.2024, this Court specifically observed that as the applicants were not named as accused persons when the FIR was registered and that they were arraigned as accused subsequently, it would be necessary to peruse the material that has come on record during the course of investigation. In that light, it is also necessary to peruse the material that has been filed along with the charge-sheet, which may indicate the role of the applicants. 5.
In view of the above, list these applications for further consideration on 13.11.2024, H.O.B.
6.
The learned counsel for the applicants shall take specific instructions on the aspect as to whether the applicants did appear before the investigating officer on 27.07.2024. On the next date of listing, the relevant portions of the charge-sheet shall also be kept ready for perusal of this Court.
7.
The interim order shall continue to operate till the next date. (MANISH PITALE, J.) Minal Parab 2/2