← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/2290/2024disposed off

Rushabh Santosh Jain And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra

2024-10-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale2 pages

913_ABA2290&2443_24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2290 OF 2024

1. Rushabh Santosh Jain

2. Dinesh Chaganlal Rathod ...

Applicants Vs.

State of Maharashtra and another ...

Respondents WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2443 OF 2024

1. Pappu Pandurang Mirkute

2. Ramchandra Ganpat Sawant

3. Dilip Genu Kamble ...

Applicants Vs.

State of Maharashtra and another ...

Respondents --- Mr. Satyam H. Nimbalkar a/w. Mr. Abhishek U. Arote, Mr. Aman D. Pawar and Mr. Padmasingh Patil for Applicants in ABA/2290/2024. Mr. Sachin R. Pawar for Applicants in ABA/2443/2024. Ms. R. V. Newton, APP for Respondent No.1-State in ABA/2290/2024. Mr. Balraj B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent No.1-State in ABA/2443/2024. Mr. A. V. Konde-Deshmukh for Respondent No.2 in ABA/2290/2024. Mr. Uday S. Kondhalkar for Respondent No.2 in ABA/2443/2024. Ms. Aruna Pai for the proposed intervenor.

CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

DATE : OCTOBER 16, 2024 P.C. :

.

In these two applications, interim protection is operating in favour of the applicants as the informants have shown their inclination to settle the dispute with the applicants, subject to certain steps being taken in that regard.

2.

Learned counsel appearing for the applicants in Anticipatory Bail MINAL SANDIP PARAB by MINAL SANDIP PARAB Date: 2024.10.16 18:06:41 +0530 Application No.2290 of 2024 has tendered an affidavit dated 15.10.2024 1/2

913_ABA2290&2443_24.doc to apprise this Court about further steps taken in the light of the earlier orders passed by this Court. The said affidavit is taken on record. 3.

This Court is also informed that the applicants in Anticipatory Bail Application No.2443 of 2024 have also taken necessary steps in order to settle the dispute with the informant. It appears that further subsequent steps may have to be taken by the parties to put a quietus to their inter se disputes. Although such steps may not necessarily mean that the allegation of criminality is taken away, but it will certainly be a factor to be taken into consideration by this Court for confirming the interim orders and disposing of the present applications. 4.

In view of the above, list these applications for further consideration on 19.11.2024, High on Board.

5.

The interim orders shall continue to operate till then. (MANISH PITALE, J.) Minal Parab 2/2