Vivek Vijay Pandit v. State Of Maharashtra

923_ABA_2637_24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2637 OF 2024 Shakil Haji Makbul Sayyad ...

Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3938 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2637 OF 2024 ALONGWITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2608 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4333 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3893 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2608 OF 2024 Mr. Rupesh A. Zade for applicant in ABA/2637/2024. Mr. Yogesh Devnani, Mr. Vachan Bodke and Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad, i/b. V & M Legal for applicant in ABA/2608/24.

Mr. Vishwajeet V. Mohite for applicant in IA/4333/24 in ABA/2608/24. Mr. Sanjiv Kadam, i/b. Mr. Siddharth Karpe for applicant in IA/3938/24 in ABA/2637/24 and in IA/3893/24 in ABA/2608/24. Mr. Tanveer G. Khan, APP for respondent-State in ABA/2637/24. Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for respondent-State in ABA/2608/24. CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

DATE :

22nd OCTOBER, 2024 Digitally signed by PRIYA KAMBLI Date:

2024.10.23 10:32:26 +0530 1/2 PRIYA KAMBLI

923_ABA_2637_24.doc P.C. :

.

In these applications, the learned APPs submitted that the investigation has progressed and there is sufficient material to indicate the involvement of the applicants herein, thereby indicating that the applications deserve to be dismissed.

2.

Considering the number of statements recorded during the course of investigation, it would be appropriate that the learned APPs in both these applications prepare a short note for assisting this Court and to place the relevant statements of witnesses alongwith the aforesaid notes, for a comprehensive hearing on both these applications. 3.

List on 24.10.2024. Interim order shall continue to operate till then. (MANISH PITALE, J) Priya Kambli 2/2