Kishor Himatlal Mehta And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra

1-ABA-2864-2024 (CR) .doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2864/2024 KISHOR HIMATLAL MEHTA & ANR.

..APPLICANTS VS.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4948/2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2864/2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4947/2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3125/2024 PRATIK BHUPENDRA SHAH ..APPLICANT VS.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

..RESPONDENTS WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2616/2024 JUANA SANJEEV UPPAL & ANR.

..APPLICANTS VS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3125/2024 ABHAY KISHORE MEHTA ..APPLICANT VS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ____________________________________ Adv. Rizwan Merchant a/w. Adv. Ashish Chavan, Adv. Varun Thokal, Adv. Jayesh Bhosale, Adv. Mayur Mohite i/b. Mayur Mohite for applicant in ABA/2616/2024.

by AMOL DILIPRAO NAWALE Date:

2025.04.26 13:03:46 +0530 AMOL DILIPRAO NAWALE Adv. Akshay Kamble a/w. Adv. Umesh Waydande, Adv. Neha Patil,Adv. Pritesh Bodekar, Adv. Trupti Poojary i/b. Vivaka Partners for the applicant in ABA/2864/2024.

Amol D. Nawale

1-ABA-2864-2024 (CR) .doc Adv. Anuj Jhaveri, Adv. Vatsal Thakkar, Adv. Ritisha Choudhary i/b. Adv. Anuj Jhaveri for the intervener in IA/4948/24 & IA/4947/24. Adv. Niranjan Mundargi a/w. Adv. Grishma Lad, Adv. Keral Mehta, Adv. Priyanka Yadav, Adv. Shivangi Singh i/b. Adv. Anuj Jhaveri for applicant in ABA/3125/2024.

Mr. Avinash Naik, APP for the State in all ABA. PI Sanjay Patil, Santacruz Police Station.

____________________________________

CORAM

: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATED : 24 APRIL 2025 P.C.:

1.

The learned APP submits that he has specific instructions that the custody of the present applicant is not necessary. Mr. Jhaveri, the learned advocate appearing for the first informant, submits that Senior Advocate Mr. Aabad Ponda is appearing in this proceeding and is currently on his legs in another matter. Therefore, he requests that the matter be kept back. As the first informant wishes to be heard in the present proceedings, notwithstanding the statement made by the learned APP that the custody of the present applicant is not necessary at this stage.

2.

Stand over to 28 April 2025 under the caption "For Directions". 3.

In the meanwhile, earlier statement made by the learned APP to continue till the next date of the hearing.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Amol D. Nawale