Shri Mohd Hasar Abdul Samad Khan v. The State Of Maharashtra

915_ABA3067_24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3067 OF 2024 Mohd. Hasar Abdul Samad Khan ...

Applicant Vs.

State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent Mr. Virendra Pethe i/b. Mr. Sanjay Patil for Applicant. Ms. Rutuja A. Ambekar, APP for Respondent-State. Mr. Karansingh Rajput for First Informant.

CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

DATE : NOVEMBER 27, 2024 P.C. :

.

On 19.11.2024, this Court passed the following order:- ".

When this application is called out, this Court is informed that the applicant has taken no objection from the advocate on record engaged in filing the application. 2.

As a consequence, today, there is no effective appearance for the applicant in this application, although being an application for anticipatory bail, it is by its very nature, an urgent proceeding.

3.

The learned APP and the learned counsel, having instructions to appear on behalf of the first informant, are present in Court and ready for arguments.

4.

In view of the above, list on 27.11.2024, to be included in the supplementary list.

5.

It is made clear that there is no interim order in the present case."

2.

Today, when the application is called out for hearing, there is no appearance on behalf of the applicant, while the learned APP as well as the learned counsel having instructions to appear on behalf of the first MINAL SANDIP PARAB MINAL SANDIP PARAB Date: 2024.11.27 17:19:01 +0530 informant are present in Court and they are ready for arguments. 1/2

915_ABA3067_24.doc 3.

In view of the above, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(MANISH PITALE, J.) Minal Parab 2/2