Anandkumar Gajkumar Narkhade v. State Of Maharashtra

912.ABA.3100.2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3100 OF 2024 Anandkumar Gajkumar Narkhade ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

***  Mr. Abhijit Dilip Kulkarni, for Applicant.

 Mr. Prasanna P. Malshe, APP for Respondent. SHRIKANT SHRINIVAS MALANI SHRIKANT SHRINIVAS MALANI Date: 2024.11.22 10:50:21 +0530 *** CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

DATE : 21st NOVEMBER, 2024.

P. C. :

1.

In this application, at the outset the learned counsel for the applicant relied upon statements made in paragraph Nos.1 and 2 of the application, to contend that the anticipatory bail application filed before the Sessions Court, which was dismissed on 04th October, 2024, was the first such anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the applicant. But, the learned APP correctly points out that in the application filed before the Sessions Court, it was stated that the said application was the second anticipatory bail application of the applicant, the first application having been rejected on 30 th May, 2019.

2.

If the statement made before the Sessions Court in the anticipatory bail application is correct, the statements made in the present application before this Court on affidavit by the applicant can be said to be Shrikant Malani

912.ABA.3100.2024.doc false statements. On this ground alone the present application deserves to be dismissed.

3.

In this backdrop, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks adjournment to take appropriate instructions in the matter. 4.

Hence, list on 27th November, 2024, to be included in the "Supplementary List."

(MANISH PITALE, J.) Shrikant Malani