Vinayak Sadashiv Thite v. State Of Maharashtra

3-ABA-3548-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3548 OF 2024 Vinayak Sadashiv Thite ...Applicant

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ....

Mr. Raju Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Tanveer Gurvindar Khan A.P.P. for the Respondent No.1 - State. Mr. R. Malekar, (H.C.) Shikrapur Police Station, present. ....

CORAM

:

N. R. BORKAR, J.

DATE :

2nd JANUARY, 2025.

P.C.

:

1.

The learned counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to implead the complainant as a party-Respondent to the present Application. Leave as sought is granted. Necessary amendment shall be carried out forthwith.

2.

Issue notice to Respondents, returnable on 14th January, 2025.

3.

Learned A.P.P. waives service of notice upon Respondent No.1.

4.

I have perused the First Information Report. Prima facie the incident does not appears to be premeditated. The applicant is a teacher. In that view of the matter, till next date, the applicant shall not be arrested.

(N. R. BORKAR, J.) by SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Date:

2025.01.02 15:12:44 +0530 SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Sajakali Jamadar