Tushar Manik Shardul v. Devyani Tushar Shardul And ANR.

910-ia-29-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.29 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.654 OF 2024 Tushar Manik Shardul ...Applicant

Versus

Devyani Tushar Shardul & Anr.

...Respondents

_______________________________________________________________ Ms. Jyoti B. Pandey, for the Applicant.

Ms. A. S. Gotad, APP for the Respondent - State. _______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED: 20th MARCH 2025 P.C.:

1.

Heard Ms. Pandey, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant. 2.

This Court has issued notice by Order dated 28th January 2025. Ms. Pandey, learned Counsel states that Respondents have been served by personal service and accordingly affidavit of service is also filed on 25th February 2025.

3.

In Interim Application No.29/2025 the prayer is to condone delay of 134 days in filing Criminal Revision Application. As in spite of service of notice, none appears for the Respondents, the contentions raised in the Interim Application have remained uncontroverted. 4.

Accordingly, for the reasons set out in the Interim Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Vaibhav Page No. 1